1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 388 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2010 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Caterham | Cadillac |
| Model | 1700 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 556 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 68 L |
