1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2010 Ford Kuga
To start off, 2010 Ford Kuga is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Kuga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2010 Ford Kuga. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Kuga.
Because 2010 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2010 Ford Kuga | |
| Make | Caterham | Ford |
| Model | 1700 | Kuga |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 175 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 53 L |
