1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2010 Holden Captiva
To start off, 2010 Holden Captiva is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2010 Holden Captiva. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Captiva.
Because 2010 Holden Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2010 Holden Captiva | |
| Make | Caterham | Holden |
| Model | 1700 | Captiva |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 17.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 65 L |
