1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder (266 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2010 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Caterham | Nissan |
Model | 1700 | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4884 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1844 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 80 L |