1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2010 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2010 Seat Exeo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Seat Exeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2010 Seat Exeo. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2010 Seat Exeo.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Seat Exeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2010 Seat Exeo | |
Make | Caterham | Seat |
Model | 1700 | Exeo |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 204 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4661 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1772 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2642 mm |