1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2010 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2010 Toyota Sienna is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Sienna (266 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Sienna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Toyota Sienna has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Toyota Sienna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2010 Toyota Sienna | |
Make | Caterham | Toyota |
Model | 1700 | Sienna |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1966 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 76 L |