1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2011 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2011 Lotus Evora is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2011 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Caterham | Lotus |
| Model | 1700 | Evora |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4341 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1222 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2576 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 59 L |
