1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz B
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz B is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,699 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2011 Mercedes-Benz B. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2011 Mercedes-Benz B.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2011 Mercedes-Benz B | |
| Make | Caterham | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 1700 | B |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 184 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 54 L |
