1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLS (402 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2011 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Caterham | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 1700 | CLS |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 4663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 402 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 12.0:1 |
Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 80 L |