1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W (222 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2011 SsangYong Chairman W | |
| Make | Caterham | SsangYong |
| Model | 1700 | Chairman W |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 222 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1895 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1495 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2970 mm |
