1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2012 Buick Regal
To start off, 2012 Buick Regal is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Buick Regal (270 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2012 Buick Regal | |
| Make | Caterham | Buick |
| Model | 1700 | Regal |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4831 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1857 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2738 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 68 L |
