1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2012 Toyota Hilux
To start off, 2012 Toyota Hilux is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Hilux is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Hilux. (135 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Hilux.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2012 Toyota Hilux | |
Make | Caterham | Toyota |
Model | 1700 | Hilux |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 80 L |