1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2013 BMW M5
To start off, 2013 BMW M5 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 4,395 cc (10 cylinders), 2013 BMW M5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW M5 (493 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 325 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW M5 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2013 BMW M5 | |
Make | Caterham | BMW |
Model | 1700 | M5 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 4395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 493 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0 :1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4863 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1846 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1469 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2889 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 70 L |