1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Caterham | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1700 | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4771 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2857 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 71 L |
