1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2013 Dodge DURANGO
To start off, 2013 Dodge DURANGO is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge DURANGO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge DURANGO (286 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge DURANGO should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2013 Dodge DURANGO is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Dodge DURANGO will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Dodge DURANGO has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge DURANGO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2013 Dodge DURANGO | |
| Make | Caterham | Dodge |
| Model | 1700 | DURANGO |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 286 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 5075 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2172 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1801 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3042 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 93 L |
