1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (438 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Caterham 1700 | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | 1700 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 438 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1412 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 61 L |