1986 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 444 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chevrolet Astro | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Astro | C30 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1895 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2639 mm |