1986 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Blazer (156 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 670 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Blazer (312 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chevrolet Blazer | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Blazer | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |
