1986 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Blazer. (91 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Blazer.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chevrolet Blazer. (182 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chevrolet Blazer | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Blazer | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2471 cc | 3727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 269 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2340 mm |