1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1964 DKW Munga
To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 460 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 1964 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Camaro | Munga |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5040 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2010 mm |
