1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1964 Morris Minor
To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morris Minor would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1964 Morris Minor. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1964 Morris Minor.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Morris Minor. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Morris Minor.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 1964 Morris Minor | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Morris |
| Model | Camaro | Minor |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2190 mm |
