1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1964 Simca 1000
To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1964 Simca 1000. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1964 Simca 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Simca 1000. (73 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Simca 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 1964 Simca 1000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Simca |
| Model | Camaro | 1000 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 944 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 73 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2230 mm |
