1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1965 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1965 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 1965 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Camaro | 2CV |
Year Released | 1986 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5040 cc | 425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2410 mm |