1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1965 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 1965 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Camaro | 2CV |
Year Released | 1986 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |