1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1967 Ford GT 40

To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (190 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 660 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (386 Nm) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Chevrolet Camaro 1967 Ford GT 40
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Camaro GT 40
Year Released 1986 1967
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 5040 cc 4195 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 190 HP 350 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 7200 RPM
Torque 386 Nm 85 Nm
Engine Bore Size 95 mm 95.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 72.9 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 910 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4070 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1040 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2420 mm