1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1968 Trabant P 601
To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Trabant P 601. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Trabant P 601 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1968 Trabant P 601. (26 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1968 Trabant P 601.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Trabant P 601, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Trabant P 601. (54 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Trabant P 601.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 1968 Trabant P 601 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Trabant |
Model | Camaro | P 601 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 593 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 54 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2030 mm |