1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Camaro | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
