1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1977 Mazda 616
To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 660 kg more than 1977 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (386 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 1977 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | 616 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1977 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5040 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 386 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2480 mm |