1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1979 Lancia Delta
To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Lancia Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Lancia Delta would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1979 Lancia Delta. (75 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1979 Lancia Delta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 635 kg more than 1979 Lancia Delta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Lancia Delta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (386 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Lancia Delta. (105 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Lancia Delta.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 1979 Lancia Delta | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lancia |
Model | Camaro | Delta |
Year Released | 1986 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5040 cc | 1301 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 386 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 86.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 55.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2480 mm |