1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1982 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (386 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 1982 Fiat Argenta | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Camaro | Argenta |
Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5040 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 386 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 71.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2570 mm |