1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1991 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1991 Ford Tempo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Tempo (97 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 1991 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | Tempo |
Year Released | 1986 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 2305 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2540 mm |