1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1991 Mini MK VI
To start off, 1991 Mini MK VI is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mini MK VI (96 HP @ 6130 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mini MK VI should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mini MK VI. (116 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 1991 Mini MK VI | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
| Model | Camaro | MK VI |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6130 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2650 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2040 mm |
