1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1996 Saturn SL
To start off, 1996 Saturn SL is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Saturn SL (100 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Saturn SL should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Saturn SL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Saturn SL. (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Saturn SL.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 1996 Saturn SL | |
Make | Chevrolet | Saturn |
Model | Camaro | SL |
Year Released | 1986 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |