1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch
To start off, 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Camaro | Swatch |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2860 mm |
