1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1999 Suzuki Baleno

To start off, 1999 Suzuki Baleno is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Suzuki Baleno (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki Baleno should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.

Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki Baleno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki Baleno. (174 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki Baleno.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Chevrolet Camaro 1999 Suzuki Baleno
Make Chevrolet Suzuki
Model Camaro Baleno
Year Released 1986 1999
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2474 cc 1298 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 126 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 179 Nm 174 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 3910 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2490 mm