1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2001 Fiat Doblo

To start off, 2001 Fiat Doblo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2001 Fiat Doblo. (64 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2001 Fiat Doblo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 350 kg more than 2001 Fiat Doblo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Fiat Doblo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (386 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Fiat Doblo. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Fiat Doblo.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Chevrolet Camaro 2001 Fiat Doblo
Make Chevrolet Fiat
Model Camaro Doblo
Year Released 1986 2001
Body Type Coupe Panel Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5040 cc 1246 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 190 HP 64 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 386 Nm 102 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 95 mm 70.8 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 78.9 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 1220 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4170 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2580 mm