1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2001 Renault Talisman
To start off, 2001 Renault Talisman is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP) has 116 more horse power than 2001 Renault Talisman. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2001 Renault Talisman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Renault Talisman weights approximately 30 kg more than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (386 Nm) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Renault Talisman. (105 Nm). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Renault Talisman.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 2001 Renault Talisman | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Camaro | Talisman |
Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5040 cc | 4500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 386 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2750 mm |