1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2001 Suzuki SX
To start off, 2001 Suzuki SX is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Suzuki SX (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki SX should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki SX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki SX. (106 Nm). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki SX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 2001 Suzuki SX | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Camaro | SX |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1298 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 126 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |
