1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2002 Ford Tonka
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 268 kg more than 2002 Ford Tonka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (386 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 2002 Ford Tonka | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Camaro | Tonka |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5040 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 386 Nm | 814 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1302 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 6150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2370 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 4200 mm |
