1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2002 Kia Pregio
To start off, 2002 Kia Pregio is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2002 Kia Pregio. (93 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Pregio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Kia Pregio weights approximately 110 kg more than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Pregio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 2002 Kia Pregio | |
Make | Chevrolet | Kia |
Model | Camaro | Pregio |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5040 cc | 2476 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2590 mm |