1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Chevrolet SS
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet SS (430 HP) has 341 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet SS should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet SS (583 Nm) has 404 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (179 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 2003 Chevrolet SS | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
| Model | Camaro | SS |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 430 HP |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 583 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3080 mm |
