1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2003 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 745 kg more than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (386 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 2003 Daewoo Matiz | |
Make | Chevrolet | Daewoo |
Model | Camaro | Matiz |
Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5040 cc | 994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 386 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 68.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 67.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2350 mm |