1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Mahindra CL

To start off, 2003 Mahindra CL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 268 kg more than 2003 Mahindra CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (386 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mahindra CL.

Compare all specifications: