1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2003 Mahindra CL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra CL.
Because 2003 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 2003 Mahindra CL | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mahindra |
| Model | Camaro | CL |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 2523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2040 mm |
