1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Saturn L

To start off, 2003 Saturn L is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Saturn L (180 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.

Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Saturn L, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Saturn L (257 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Chevrolet Camaro 2003 Saturn L
Make Chevrolet Saturn
Model Camaro L
Year Released 1986 2003
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2474 cc 2996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 89 HP 180 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 179 Nm 257 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2710 mm