1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Kia |
| Model | Camaro | K2700 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 2665 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4150 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2380 mm |
