1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9000 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (386 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 9000. (350 Nm). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 9000.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
Model | Camaro | 9000 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5040 cc | 2290 cc |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 386 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1590 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2710 mm |