1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 408 kg more than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (386 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Cherokee. (343 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Camaro | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5040 cc | 2499 cc |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 386 Nm | 343 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 17.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1978 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2660 mm |