1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2011 Honda Jazz

To start off, 2011 Honda Jazz is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 89 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.

Because 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Honda Jazz. (114 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Honda Jazz.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Chevrolet Camaro 2011 Honda Jazz
Make Chevrolet Honda
Model Camaro Jazz
Year Released 1986 2011
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2474 cc 1198 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 179 Nm 114 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4900 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 3910 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2500 mm