1986 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2011 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2011 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Saab 03-Sep (210 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (190 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2011 Saab 03-Sep is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Camaro (386 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Saab 03-Sep. (299 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Saab 03-Sep.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | 2011 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
| Model | Camaro | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5040 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 386 Nm | 299 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4689 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1801 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1529 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2675 mm |
